Aishe News

In a move that's sure to strike a chord, the Recording Academy has declared that only human creators are eligible for the Grammy Awards. Say goodbye to AI-only work, folks! It seems the era of robot rockstars is not quite here yet. But fear not, AI enthusiasts! There's a glimmer of hope for those songs that received a little digital assistance. The academy's updated rulebook states that music created with AI help may still qualify in certain categories. So, as long as humans have their musical fingerprints on it, AI can join the Grammy party too! However, the new rules demand that music creators must contribute to at least 20% of an album to earn a nomination. Gone are the days when a mere nod from a producer or a featured artist could secure an album of the year nomination. It's all about human involvement now, folks! While the music industry is grappling with the rise of AI, it's not alone in its concerns. Screenwriters and actors are also feeling t...

Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! There’s a growing debate among copyright lawyers about whether the producer of graphical AI technologies, such as MidJourney and Dall-E, should be granted copyright protection. The rule of the Copyright Office, so far at least, is that they should not. Maybe, the Office suggests, if the artist demonstrates sufficiently creative prompts. But so far, the Copyright Office has rejected copyright in every case presented to it. AI Artists Demand Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! This conclusion is not just wrong. It is a strategic mistake. There is no reason under existing law why the user of a machine that produces creative work shouldn’t be granted a copyright. And the chance to craft a regime that could efficiently secure copyright to the users of AI is an opportunity for copyright generally that we should not miss.   In a world where humans and AI collaborate to create art, we must acknowledge the role of the human artist op...