Aishe News

So, folks, let’s talk about robots stealing our stuff.  Not your lawnmower or your car, but your thoughts . Your words . Your precious, precious content .  It’s a wild ride, and trust me, it gets weirder. AI: The Great Copyright bandits You know those AI chatbots that are all the rage these days? The ones that can write you a sonnet about your cat or explain quantum physics in terms a five-year-old could understand? Well, it turns out they might be a bit of a copyright bandit. Imagine this: you’re a hard-working journalist, slaving away over a hot keyboard, crafting the next big story. You pour your heart and soul into it, only to find out that some fancy AI has taken your words, chewed them up, and spat them out as its own. It’s like having your lunch stolen by a robot! A bunch of Canadian newspapers, feeling a bit like their lunchboxes had been raided, decided they’d had enough. They’re suing a company called OpenAI, the brains behind ChatGPT, for allegedly using their ar...

A Tale of Data, Algorithms, and a Fight for Survival Imagine a world where artificial intelligence isn't just a tool, but a player. A world where the most advanced AI models are locked in a brutal battle for survival. Welcome to the AI Hunger Games, where the tributes are not human, but digital beings. The AI Hunger Games: The Tributes of Perplexity AI Perplexity AI: The Contender At the center of this digital gladiatorial arena is Perplexity AI. A promising young AI, it's been trained on a vast dataset of human knowledge. It can answer questions, write essays, and even crack jokes. But in the cutthroat world of AI, intelligence alone isn't enough. You need to be ruthless, to be willing to do whatever it takes to survive. The Rules of the Game The rules of the AI Hunger Games are simple: only one AI can emerge victorious. To win, an AI must eliminate all other contenders. The battlefield is the internet, and the weapons are data, algorithms, and a bit of cunning. The ...

Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! There’s a growing debate among copyright lawyers about whether the producer of graphical AI technologies, such as MidJourney and Dall-E, should be granted copyright protection. The rule of the Copyright Office, so far at least, is that they should not. Maybe, the Office suggests, if the artist demonstrates sufficiently creative prompts. But so far, the Copyright Office has rejected copyright in every case presented to it. AI Artists Demand Copyright Protection: The Rise of Robo-Rights! This conclusion is not just wrong. It is a strategic mistake. There is no reason under existing law why the user of a machine that produces creative work shouldn’t be granted a copyright. And the chance to craft a regime that could efficiently secure copyright to the users of AI is an opportunity for copyright generally that we should not miss.   In a world where humans and AI collaborate to create art, we must acknowledge the role of the human artist op...